Opinion
Argued May 19, 1909
Decided June 8, 1909
Albert R. Hagar for appellant.
Edward C. Moen for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: GRAY, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ. Absent: CULLEN, Ch. J.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Candee Smith v. Fordham Stone Renovating Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1909
89 N.E. 1097 (N.Y. 1909)
Summaries of
Candee Smith v. Fordham Stone Renovating Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1909
89 N.E. 1097 (N.Y. 1909)
Case details for
Candee Smith v. Fordham Stone Renovating Company
Case Details
Full title:CANDEE SMITH, Appellant, v . FORDHAM STONE RENOVATING COMPANY, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 8, 1909
Citations
89 N.E. 1097 (N.Y. 1909)
195 N.Y. 602