From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cancio v. Target Stores

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 30, 2005
897 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D02-2337.

March 30, 2005.

An Appeal from the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Juan J. Cancio, in proper person.

John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellee, (Commission).

Before WELLS, SUAREZ, and CORTINAS, JJ.


Juan J. Cancio appeals from an order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission dismissing as untimely his appeal of a decision denying him benefits. We affirm.

Cancio does not claim that he did not receive the appeals referee's decision, or that he received it too late to file a timely reply. See Guerrero v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 855 So.2d 266, 268-69 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). The Commission, therefore, properly dismissed his appeal as it was not filed within twenty days of the date that the referee's decision was mailed to him. § 443.151(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003); Guerrero, 855 So.2d at 268 ("Under section 443.151(4)(b)3 of the Florida Statutes, an aggrieved party has twenty days after mailing or delivery of a referee's decision to initiate an appeal with the UAC. Failure to perfect an appeal within twenty days subjects a claim to dismissal under Florida Administrative Code Rule 60BB-7.006. There are no good cause exceptions to this dismissal rule").

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Cancio v. Target Stores

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 30, 2005
897 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Cancio v. Target Stores

Case Details

Full title:Juan J. CANCIO, Appellant, v. TARGET STORES, a Division of Dayton Hudson…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 30, 2005

Citations

897 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)