From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canada v. Doe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 11, 2024
24-cv-00821-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-00821-WHO (PR)

04-11-2024

RONALD LEE CANADA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Plaintiff Ronald Lee Canada sent a letter to the court received on February 12, 2024, and has not responded to the Clerk's Notices to file a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (or pay the filing fee). Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to comply with the Clerk's Notices and for failing to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Canada may move to reopen. Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page; (ii) contain a complaint on this Court's form; and (iii) contain a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or full payment for the $402.00 filing fee.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Canada v. Doe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 11, 2024
24-cv-00821-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2024)
Case details for

Canada v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:RONALD LEE CANADA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 11, 2024

Citations

24-cv-00821-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2024)