From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campos-Riedel v. JP Morgan Chase

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 19, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-2819 TLN DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-2819 TLN DAD PS

04-19-2013

SOFIA CAMPOS-RIEDEL, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, Sofia Campos-Riedel, is proceeding pro se in this action. Accordingly, the matter has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On January 17, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion for permission to file pleadings electronically. (Doc. No. 13.) On February 22, 2013, plaintiff appeared before the court, was advised that her motion was deficient and was directed to remedy those defects. Plaintiff, however, has failed to take further action with respect to her motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's January 17, 2013 motion for permission to file pleadings electronically (Doc. No. 13) is denied without prejudice.

___________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Campos-Riedel v. JP Morgan Chase

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 19, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-2819 TLN DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Campos-Riedel v. JP Morgan Chase

Case Details

Full title:SOFIA CAMPOS-RIEDEL, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 19, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-2819 TLN DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2013)