From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campos-Larios v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 8, 2022
640 S.W.3d 770 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84133

03-08-2022

Alfredo J. CAMPOS-LARIOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Kathryn M. Merwald, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.


Kathryn M. Merwald, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge, Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Alfredo J. Campos-Larios appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, arguing that trial counsel failed to adequately advise him about the likelihood of conviction due to the strength of the State's case, as well as the substantial risk of receiving a harsher sentence if he went to trial. Campos-Larios contends that, had trial counsel done so, he would have accepted the State's plea offer and received a more lenient sentence. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Campos-Larios v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 8, 2022
640 S.W.3d 770 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Campos-Larios v. State

Case Details

Full title:Alfredo J. CAMPOS-LARIOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

640 S.W.3d 770 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)