Opinion
February 1, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burchell, J.).
Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the plaintiffs are awarded one bill of costs.
The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the testimony of the plaintiff's expert Marcia Knight, a clinical psychologist, was not based on speculation and therefore was properly admitted. The record reveals that she based her opinion on a number of tests administered to the infant plaintiff and not merely on a comparison of the intelligence-quotient-test results. In view of her qualifications, her opinion was entitled to such consideration as the jury chose to give it.
In addition, the court properly charged the jury on the issue of the loss of future earning capacity. It is well settled that although the computation of damages in a case such as this "is necessarily speculative and fraught with difficulties" (Snow v State of New York, 98 A.D.2d 442, 450, affd 64 N.Y.2d 745) the loss of future earnings of an infant plaintiff is properly compensable (see, Ledogar v Giordano, 122 A.D.2d 834, appeal withdrawn 68 N.Y.2d 911). In the instant case there was sufficient evidence presented to establish a reasonable basis for the jury to award such damages if it so chose.
Finally, the award of $254,000 in damages was not excessive. Thompson, J.P., Rubin, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.