From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 31, 2014
Case Number: 1:14cv49 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 31, 2014)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:14cv49

07-31-2014

Arthur Campbell, Petitioner(s), v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Respondents(s).


ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on June 10, 2014 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11). Subsequently, the petitioner filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13), the respondent filed a response to the objections (Doc. 14) and petitioner filed a response (Doc. 15).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 7) is GRANTED, and that petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice.

A certificate of appealability will not issue with respect to the two grounds for relief alleged in the petition, because petitioner has not made a substantial showing that he has stated a "viable claim of the denial of a constitutional right" or that the issues presented in the remaining grounds are "adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 475 (citing Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 & n.4 (1983)); see also 28 U.S.C. §ss53( c ); Fed. R. App.P. 22(b).

With respect to any application by petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, the Court will certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation will not be taken in "good faith," and therefore DENY petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis upon a showing of financial necessity. See Fed. R. App.P.24(a); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949, 952 (6th Cir. 1997).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Susan J. Dlott

Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court


Summaries of

Campbell v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 31, 2014
Case Number: 1:14cv49 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Campbell v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:Arthur Campbell, Petitioner(s), v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 31, 2014

Citations

Case Number: 1:14cv49 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 31, 2014)