From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Sheriff

Supreme Court of Nevada
Oct 20, 1976
555 P.2d 218 (Nev. 1976)

Opinion

No. 9013

October 20, 1976

Appeal from the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joseph S. Pavlikowski, J.

J.E. Smith, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; George E. Holt, District Attorney, and Frank J. Morton, Deputy, Clark County, for Respondent.


OPINION


An indictment, authorized as a result of a True Bill by the Clark County Grand Jury, charged Joyce E. Campbell with selling a controlled substance (marijuana), a felony under NRS 453.321 and NRS 453.161.

A pretrial petition for habeas corpus challenged the quantum of evidence to sustain the charge. Habeas was denied and in this appeal the same contention is reurged.

The only evidence connecting Ms. Campbell to the charged offense was that she and her two month old child were in a residence when an undercover agent purchased a baggie of marijuana from another person. After the transaction was completed the undercover agent requested Ms. Campbell to go to the kitchen and get him a paper sack, which she did.

The physical presence and recited conduct of Ms. Campbell may well subject her to some criminal charge; however, we deem this evidence insufficient to establish probable cause that she made a "sale." Cf. Egan v. Sheriff, 88 Nev. 611, 503 P.2d 16 (1972). Accordingly, the charge against her should have been dismissed in the writ proceedings.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Sheriff

Supreme Court of Nevada
Oct 20, 1976
555 P.2d 218 (Nev. 1976)
Case details for

Campbell v. Sheriff

Case Details

Full title:JOYCE E. CAMPBELL, APPELLANT, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Oct 20, 1976

Citations

555 P.2d 218 (Nev. 1976)
555 P.2d 218

Citing Cases

Twigg v. Sheriff

Although his association and the recited conduct may well expose him to some criminal liability, the evidence…