From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Peele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 20, 2001
289 A.D.2d 141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

5720N

December 20, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne Targum, J.), entered on or about March 23, 2001, which, in an action for personal injuries arising out of a car accident involving a car owned by the corporate defendant and rented by the individual defendant, denied plaintiffs' motion to strike defendants' answer because of the individual defendant's failure to appear for deposition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

MARIE R. HODUKAVICH, for plaintiffs-appellants.

LAWRENCE R. MILES, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin, Saxe, JJ.


The motion was properly denied with a direction precluding the individual defendant from testifying at trial unless she appears for deposition at least 60 days prior to trial, in view of the individual defendant's apparent change of address and defense counsel's ongoing good faith efforts to locate her (see, Heyward v. Benyarko, 82 A.D.2d 751).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Peele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 20, 2001
289 A.D.2d 141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Campbell v. Peele

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN CAMPBELL, ETC., et al., plaintiffs-appellants, v. DIANE PEELE, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 20, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 449

Citing Cases

Warshaw Burstein Cohen Schlesinger & Kuh, LLP v. Birnbaum

It is equally well settled that where a party disobeys a court order and his or her conduct frustrates the…

Sarabella v. Nappo

Although the drastic remedy of striking a pleading pursuant to CPLR 3126 for failure to comply with…