From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Leslie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Jul 3, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18-cv-00357 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 3, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18-cv-00357

07-03-2019

DAVID ATREYEL CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. MS. LESLIE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On February 26, 2018, the Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed his Prisoner Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (Document 1) and his Complaint (Document 2). By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on February 27, 2018, the matter was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.

On June 10, 2019, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 8) wherein it is recommended that this Court deny the Plaintiff's Prisoner Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (Document 1), dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint (Document 2), and remove this matter from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by June 10, 2019, and none were filed by either party.

The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and a party's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff's Prisoner Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (Document 1) be DENIED, the Plaintiff's Complaint (Document 2) be DISMISSED, and this matter be REMOVED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: July 3, 2019

/s/_________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Campbell v. Leslie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Jul 3, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18-cv-00357 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 3, 2019)
Case details for

Campbell v. Leslie

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ATREYEL CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. MS. LESLIE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION

Date published: Jul 3, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18-cv-00357 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 3, 2019)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Adams

Likewise, a deprivation of electronics for 25 days is not a sufficient liberty interest to trigger…

Carter v. Williams

S.D. W.Va. June 10, 2019) (collecting authority for the proposition that a loss of privileges, such as a loss…