From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Crist

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 8, 1981
647 F.2d 956 (9th Cir. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-3285.

Submitted April 6, 1980.

Decided June 8, 1981.

Patrick James Campbell, for petitioner-appellant.

Mark J. Murphy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Helena, Mont., for respondents-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana.

Before SKOPIL and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and KENYON District Judge.

Honorable David V. Kenyon, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.


Campbell appeals the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Campbell v. Crist, 491 F. Supp. 586 (D.Mont. 1980). He contends that the state court lacked jurisdiction to try him for a robbery committed on the Flathead Indian Reservation. He raises numerous other objections regarding the adequacy of the state proceedings, and of his representation by counsel. We affirm.

Normally, a federal court will not entertain a state prisoner's petition for writ of habeas corpus unless the petitioner has exhausted available state judicial remedies. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b); Sweet v. Cupp, 640 F.2d 233 at 236 (9th Cir. 1981). If the petitioner's claim was not presented to the state courts on direct appeal, state collateral remedies must be exhausted. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(c); Sweet v. Cupp, supra.

This court may consider whether state remedies have been exhausted even if the state does not raise the issue. Rose v. Dickson, 327 F.2d 27, 28 (9th Cir. 1964). See also Sweet v. Cupp, supra at 237 n.5.

There is no indication in the record that Campbell has exhausted available state judicial remedies. In the interest of comity we will not consider the merits of Campbell's petition.

The judgment appealed from is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Crist

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 8, 1981
647 F.2d 956 (9th Cir. 1981)
Case details for

Campbell v. Crist

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK JAMES CAMPBELL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ROGER W. CRIST, WARDEN OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 8, 1981

Citations

647 F.2d 956 (9th Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Pierce Cnty.

This Court has the suasponte authority to examine the question of exhaustion at this stage of review.…

Wolsieffer v. Washington

This Court has the sua sponte authority to examine the question of exhaustion at this stage of review.…