From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Colvin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jun 9, 2015
2:14-cv-02386-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2015)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, DONNA L. CALVERT, Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration, ESTHER KIM, Special Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant

          Stephen Anthony Valizan, Attorney at Law, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION AND ORDER

          CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court as evidenced below, that the Defendant has 30 additional days to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's Counsel requests this extension due to her unusually large workload with several merit briefs due this month along with ongoing litigation in other areas. Upon issuance of this order, Defendant will have until June 29, 2015 to file her cross-motion for summary judgment.

         This is the Commissioner's first extension request. ORDER

         APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Colvin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jun 9, 2015
2:14-cv-02386-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Campbell v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:TAMALYN CHARMAINE CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Jun 9, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-02386-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2015)