From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. City of San Francisco

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Sep 5, 2007
No. C 07-3856 SBA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2007)

Opinion

No. C 07-3856 SBA.

September 5, 2007


ORDER [Docket Nos. 2, 5]


On August 20, 2007, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James issued a Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 5] recommending that the plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis [Docket No. 2] be DENIED and that the complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice. The Report and Recommendation also recommends that the plaintiff be allowed thirty days from the date her complaint is dismissed to file an amended complaint. No objections have been filed within the time allowed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. After reviewing the Report and Recommendation, the Court hereby adopts it as this Court's ORDER and DENIES the request to proceed in forma pauperis, and DISMISSES the complaint without prejudice. The Court ORDERS that if the plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint, she must do so within thirty days. If no amended complaint is filed within that time, this action will be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Campbell v. City of San Francisco

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Sep 5, 2007
No. C 07-3856 SBA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Campbell v. City of San Francisco

Case Details

Full title:ARLENE CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Sep 5, 2007

Citations

No. C 07-3856 SBA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2007)