From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Bell

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 25, 2023
2:23-cv-0815 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0815 WBS AC P

09-25-2023

MARCUS DANTEL CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. A. BELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 1, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 1, 2023 (ECF No. 6), are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Bell

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 25, 2023
2:23-cv-0815 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Campbell v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS DANTEL CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. A. BELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 25, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-0815 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)