From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Camp v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 24, 2023
CV 22-346-TUC-JAS (BGM) (D. Ariz. Mar. 24, 2023)

Opinion

CV 22-346-TUC-JAS (BGM)

03-24-2023

Stephen Carl Camp, Petitioner, v. David Shinn, et al. Respondents.


ORDER

Honorable James A. Soto, United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Macdonald. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Macdonald's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29) is accepted and adopted; this matter is STAYED as discussed in the Report and Recommendation.
(2) The Court notes that Petitioner filed an unopposed motion for an extension of time on 3/14/23 (see Docs. 30, 31); the motion (Doc. 30) is granted inasmuch as the STAY shall
continue for at least another 60 days. This case is referred back to United States Magistrate Judge Macdonald for further proceedings; to the extent further motions for the extension of the stay are filed, they shall be filed with Magistrate Judge Macdonald.


Summaries of

Camp v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 24, 2023
CV 22-346-TUC-JAS (BGM) (D. Ariz. Mar. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Camp v. Shinn

Case Details

Full title:Stephen Carl Camp, Petitioner, v. David Shinn, et al. Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Mar 24, 2023

Citations

CV 22-346-TUC-JAS (BGM) (D. Ariz. Mar. 24, 2023)