From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cammilleri v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 19, 2001
779 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 2D00-3682.

Opinion filed January 19, 2001.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Thomas S. Reese, Judge.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.


Christopher Cammilleri appeals the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Cammilleri stated that he was sentenced after he entered a plea agreement which required that he be given a guidelines sentence. He now contends that he was improperly assessed fifty-four victim injury points because the information filed against him does not allege any victim injury. This is a facially sufficient claim which the trial court did not address. See Nastri v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D2550 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 25, 2000). On remand, the trial court must reconsider this claim.

Cammilleri also contended that the trial judge expressed impermissible bias when resentencing him. This claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.800 motion, and the trial court is affirmed in its denial of this claim.

Fulmer, A.C.J., and Stringer and Davis, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Cammilleri v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 19, 2001
779 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Cammilleri v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER CAMMILLERI, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 19, 2001

Citations

779 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Licor v. State

Affirmed. See Cammilleri v. State, 779 So.2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Wright v. State, 834 So.2d 879 (Fla. 3d…

Dallas v. State

Claims of vindictive sentencing and bias are not errors in the sentence itself, but errors in the sentencing…