From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cameron v. City of Springfield

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Division at Dayton
Oct 30, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-188 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 30, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-188.

October 30, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #12), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice as to the City of Springfield for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.


Summaries of

Cameron v. City of Springfield

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Division at Dayton
Oct 30, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-188 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Cameron v. City of Springfield

Case Details

Full title:Sean Lamont Cameron, Plaintiff, v. City of Springfield, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Division at Dayton

Date published: Oct 30, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-188 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 30, 2009)