From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Camera v. Long Island University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2000
272 A.D.2d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued February 29, 2000.

May 3, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated April 13, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Vincent D. McNamara, East Norwich, N.Y. (Joseph F. Pusateri of counsel), for appellants.

Congdon, Flaherty, O'Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis Fishlinger, Garden City, N.Y. (Kathleen D. Foley of counsel), for respondent.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, SONDRA MILLER, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

In opposition to the defendants' prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Andre v. Pomeroy, 35 N.Y.2d 361). Thus, the defendants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

RITTER, J.P., SANTUCCI, S. MILLER and ALTMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Camera v. Long Island University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2000
272 A.D.2d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Camera v. Long Island University

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTIAN CAMERA, respondent, v. LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY, et al., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 356

Citing Cases

Glover v. Jack in the Box, Inc.

Defendants make a prima facie presentation for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, which the court…