From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Camacho v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jun 12, 2003
No. 2-03-033-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 12, 2003)

Opinion

No. 2-03-033-CR.

DELIVERED: June 12, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH, Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b)

From the 78th District Court of Wichita County.

PANEL A: CAYCE, C.J.; HOLMAN and GARDNER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.


Richard Lynn Camacho appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion to set appeal bond. In one point, he contends that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his request for an appeal bond. We will affirm. We review a trial court's decision regarding an appeal bond under an abuse of discretion standard. Ex parte Spaulding, 612 S.W.2d 509, 511 (Tex.Crim.App. 1981); Davis v. State, 71 S.W.3d 844, 845-46 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2002, no pet.). A trial court abuses its discretion only when it makes its decision without reference to any guiding rules or principles or, in other words, if the decision is arbitrary or unreasonable. Montgomery v. State, 810 S.W.2d 372, 380 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990). Even if we would have reached a different result, we will not intercede as long as the trial court's ruling is within the "zone of reasonable disagreement." Id. at 391 (op. on reh'g). Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his request for an appeal bond because it took judicial notice of testimony from prior proceedings. To preserve a complaint for appellate review, however, a party must have presented to the trial court a timely request, objection, or motion that states the specific grounds for the desired ruling. Tex.R.App.P. 33.1(a)(1); Mosley v. State, 983 S.W.2d 249, 265 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998) (op. on reh'g), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1070 (1999). Failure to do so results in waiver of the complaint. Because the record reflects that appellant did not object to the trial court's taking judicial notice of said testimony, appellant has presented nothing for our review. Nguyen v. State, 982 S.W.2d 945, 948 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd). Accordingly, we overrule appellant's sole issue and affirm the trial court's order denying his motion for appeal bond.


Summaries of

Camacho v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jun 12, 2003
No. 2-03-033-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 12, 2003)
Case details for

Camacho v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD LYNN CAMACHO APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jun 12, 2003

Citations

No. 2-03-033-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 12, 2003)

Citing Cases

Bolton v. State

The trial court took judicial notice of these facts, and, to the extent that such facts may not be an…