From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calspan Corporation v. Fingermatrix, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1981
84 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

November 30, 1981


In an action on a promissory note, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Kelly, J.), dated May 28, 1981, which denied its motion for permission to serve and file a demand for a jury trial. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. The demand is to be served and filed within 20 days after service on the defendant of a copy of the order to be entered hereon with notice of entry. In view of the absence of prejudice to the plaintiff, and the reasons offered by the defendant for its failure to serve and file a timely demand for a jury trial, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for Special Term to have denied the defendant's motion for permission to serve and file a jury demand. (CPLR 4102, subd [e]; Jacobs, Inc. v. Manning Mfg. Corp., 23 Misc.2d 507; see Brooks v. Brooks, 37 A.D.2d 835.) Lazer, J.P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Calspan Corporation v. Fingermatrix, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1981
84 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Calspan Corporation v. Fingermatrix, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CALSPAN CORPORATION, Respondent, v. FINGERMATRIX, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1981

Citations

84 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Romulus v. Katz

There is no proof before this court that there is any actual prejudice to any other party. (See Calspan Corp.…

Majors v. Lefrak City

Numerous court decisions have relied upon this provision to permit a party to serve and file a late jury…