From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calleja v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 20, 2005
171 S.W.3d 803 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. ED 85780.

September 20, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Robert Cohen, Judge.

Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Deborah Daniels, Evan Joseph Buchheim-co-counsel, Alison K. Brown-co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.


ORDER


Movant, Javier P. Calleja, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to advise him that he would have to complete the Missouri Sexual Offender Program before he would be eligible for parole.

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim P. 2005, unless otherwise indicated.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Calleja v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 20, 2005
171 S.W.3d 803 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Calleja v. State

Case Details

Full title:Javier P. CALLEJA, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Sep 20, 2005

Citations

171 S.W.3d 803 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)