From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Callahan v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P
Jul 2, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-2955 (W.D. La. Jul. 2, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-2955

07-02-2013

JUSTIN E. CALLAHAN 03245-095 v. J.P. YOUNG


JUDGE PATRICIA MINALDI


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN KAY


JUDGMENT

There being no objection to the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 6] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, these findings and conclusions are accepted. Alternatively, this court concludes that the proposed findings and conclusions are entirely correct. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Lake Charles, Louisiana, on this ___ day of ___, 2013.

___________

PATRICIA MINALDI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Callahan v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P
Jul 2, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-2955 (W.D. La. Jul. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Callahan v. Young

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN E. CALLAHAN 03245-095 v. J.P. YOUNG

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P

Date published: Jul 2, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-2955 (W.D. La. Jul. 2, 2013)

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. USA

However, the PLRA does not apply to federal habeas proceedings and nothing in Jones prohibits the sua sponte…

Clark v. Martinez

However, the PLRA does not apply to federal habeas proceedings and nothing in Jones prohibits the sua sponte…