From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Callahan Hydraulics, Inc. v. Mechanical Man Car Wash Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 17, 1974
43 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

January 17, 1974

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Del Vecchio, Marsh, Moule and Simons, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, defendant's motion granted and judgment vacated, upon condition defendant serve an answer with 20 days. Memorandum: A prima facie meritorious defense to plaintiff's action on two notes is established in the record. Defendant has not offered mere conclusions, which would be legally insufficient, but has shown "that there is support in fact for [its] denials and defenses" ( Investment Corp. of Philadelphia v. Spector, 12 A.D.2d 911). It is sufficient that a meritorious defense be raised by affidavits rather than by submission of a proposed answer. The record does not support the conclusion that there was a default so deliberate or contumacious as to justify forfeiture of a substantial defense. Considering plaintiff's apparent willingness to negotiate, the delay in proceedings was not overly long, and defendant moved expeditiously to vacate the default judgment once it was discovered.


Summaries of

Callahan Hydraulics, Inc. v. Mechanical Man Car Wash Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 17, 1974
43 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Callahan Hydraulics, Inc. v. Mechanical Man Car Wash Manufacturing Co.

Case Details

Full title:CALLAHAN HYDRAULICS, INC., Respondent, v. MECHANICAL MAN CAR WASH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 17, 1974

Citations

43 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Sport-O-Rama Hlt. Fitness Ctr. v. Centennial

esumption, and since the nonreceipt of a pleading will adequately excuse the failure to timely respond…

Richards, Fagone Assoc. v. Ctr. Stage Stores

In view of these facts, we find some merit in defendant's excuse that the primary reason for not affixing a…