From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. Reichardt Duck Farm, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 12, 2023
22-cv-09065-AGT (N.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-09065-AGT

05-12-2023

CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, Plaintiff, v. REICHARDT DUCK FARM, INC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ON MOTION TO SEAL RE: DKT. NO. 36

Alex G. Tse, United States Magistrate Judge.

As the designating parties, defendants were required to file a statement in support of plaintiff's motion to seal. See Civil L.R. 79-5(f)(3). Defendants didn't do so, even after the Court sua sponte extended the statement deadline. See Dkt. 39. Because defendants haven't justified the sealing request, the motion to seal is denied. By May 17, 2023, plaintiff must file unredacted versions of all documents that were filed provisionally under seal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. Reichardt Duck Farm, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 12, 2023
22-cv-09065-AGT (N.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. Reichardt Duck Farm, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, Plaintiff, v. REICHARDT DUCK…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 12, 2023

Citations

22-cv-09065-AGT (N.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)