From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

California Department of Parks & Recreation v. Newmont Mining Corporation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 7, 2013
Civ. S-12-1857 LKK/AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2013)

Opinion


CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION, Plaintiff, v. NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION; NEW VERDE MINES, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. S-12-1857 LKK/AC United States District Court, E.D. California. October 7, 2013

          ORDER

          LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

         The parties have filed a Stipulation for modifying the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order ("Scheduling Order"), changing discovery deadlines and adding separate deadlines for expert discovery. The Stipulation does not show good cause for the court to alter the Scheduling Order.

         If the parties wish to make informal arrangements regarding discovery and expert discovery deadlines, they are free to do so. However, any such consensual modifications to the Scheduling Order will not be enforced by the court.

         Accordingly, the Stipulation (ECF No. 29), to the degree it seeks court approval, is DENIED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

California Department of Parks & Recreation v. Newmont Mining Corporation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 7, 2013
Civ. S-12-1857 LKK/AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2013)
Case details for

California Department of Parks & Recreation v. Newmont Mining Corporation

Case Details

Full title:CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION, Plaintiff, v. NEWMONT MINING…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 7, 2013

Citations

Civ. S-12-1857 LKK/AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2013)