Calhoun v. Gomez

Full title: JAMONT L. CALHOUN, Plaintiff, v. M. GOMEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 24, 2013

2:12-cv-2856-GEB-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2013)

Opinion

JAMONT L. CALHOUN, Plaintiff, v. M. GOMEZ, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-2856-GEB-EFB P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 24, 2013

          ORDER

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On August 14, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed August 14, 2013, are adopted in full; and

         2. Claims against defendants Goodrich and Kuppinger are dismissed from this action as improperly joined and the claims against defendants Edington and Heintschel are dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.