From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caldwell v. Sutton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 21, 2020
19 CIVIL 5236 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 21, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 5236 (VEC)

07-21-2020

BOISEY CALDWELL, Plaintiff, v. ELINOR SUTTON, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 20, 2020, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and thus, in forma pauperis status for purposes of appeal is denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a non-frivolous issue); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

July 21, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Caldwell v. Sutton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 21, 2020
19 CIVIL 5236 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Caldwell v. Sutton

Case Details

Full title:BOISEY CALDWELL, Plaintiff, v. ELINOR SUTTON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 21, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 5236 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 21, 2020)