The question is whether or not the record contains sufficient, competent evidence to make a proper and sound determination of causation. See Caldwell v. Nance, 291 So.2d 461 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1974). Consequently, merely because the operating report is removed from consideration as evidence does not necessarily defeat the plaintiff's claim.
" Also see Squyres v. Phillips, 285 So.2d 337 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1973); Caldwell v. Nance, 291 So.2d 461 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1974); and Broussard v. Guilbeaux, 295 So.2d 216 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1974). It follows, therefore, that judgment against defendant, Rudolph Landry, must be reversed and this action dismissed as to him.