From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caldwell v. Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 23, 2008
2:07-cv-727 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 23, 2008)

Opinion

2:07-cv-727.

July 23, 2008


ORDER OF COURT


AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2008, the Plaintiff, Clay Caldwell, having filed the above captioned action, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge which granted the parties until August 1, 2008 to file written objections thereto, and Plaintiff having filed objections on July 18, 2008 which are found to be without merit, and upon independent review of the record, with full consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order, they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Caldwell v. Beard

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 23, 2008
2:07-cv-727 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 23, 2008)
Case details for

Caldwell v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:CLAY CALDWELL, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of Corrections…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 23, 2008

Citations

2:07-cv-727 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 23, 2008)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Mooney

Mitchell's dissatisfaction with this response does not constitute a cause of action."); Caldwell v. Beard,…

Williams v. Lackawanna Cnty. Prison

Mitchell's dissatisfaction with this response does not constitute a cause of action."); Caldwell v. Beard,…