Calderon v. Anderson

Full title: JOSE H. CALDERON, Petitioner, v. CARL ANDERSON, Warden, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 23, 2009

CASE NO. 2:07-cv-1280 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 23, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:07-cv-1280.

March 23, 2009

OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN HOLSCHUH, Senior District Judge

On February 11, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be dismissed. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner argues that the evidence was constitutionally insufficient to sustain his convictions. Other portions of petitioner's objections are indecipherable.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. For the reasons detailed therein, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.