From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calcano v. Effy & Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 28, 2021
21-CV-7514 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-7514 (RA)

10-28-2021

EVELINA CALCANO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. EFFY & CO., INC., Defendant.


ORDER

Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same forty-five-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Calcano v. Effy & Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 28, 2021
21-CV-7514 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Calcano v. Effy & Co.

Case Details

Full title:EVELINA CALCANO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 28, 2021

Citations

21-CV-7514 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2021)