From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calam v. Calam

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 15, 2000
752 So. 2d 722 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D99-1339.

Opinion filed March 15, 2000.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Joel H. Brown, Judge, L.T. No. 89-17859.

Luis M. Padron and Adelmis Bohigas, for appellant.

Marc L. Barbakoff; Barranco, Kircher, Vogelsang Boldt, P.A., and Kimberly Boldt, for appellee.

Before COPE, GERSTEN and SORONDO, JJ.


Alene M. Calam appeals an order modifying custody. The procedural rulings complained about by the appellant mother were within the discretion of the master and trial court, respectively. Assuming arguendo that there was any procedural error, it was cured by the trial court when it granted the mother's exceptions and reheard the case.

The order granting a change of custody of the son is supported by competent substantial evidence and is in accord with the applicable legal standards. See Teller v. Richert, 744 So.2d 1230, 1231-32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Laskey v. Peeler, 704 So.2d 1066, 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), review denied, 717 So.2d 534 (Fla. 1998).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Calam v. Calam

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 15, 2000
752 So. 2d 722 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Calam v. Calam

Case Details

Full title:ALENE M. CALAM, n/k/a ALENE M. LEWIS, Appellant, vs. MICHAEL R. CALAM…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 15, 2000

Citations

752 So. 2d 722 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Morejon v. Batan

We conclude that the child custody determination is supported by competent substantial evidence. See Rogers…