From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cain v. Paviglianti

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 13, 2022
2:20-cv-1768-DAD-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1768-DAD-JDP (PC)

10-13-2022

ANTONIO LAMONT CAIN, Plaintiff, v. B. PAVIGLIANTI, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SET A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ECF NO. 56

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed a motion asking that this case be set for a settlement conference. ECF No. 56. The undersigned has reviewed the docket and believes that at this time a settlement conference would be unlikely to be productive. Accordingly, plaintiffs request to set a settlement conference, ECF No. 56, is denied without prejudice.

If plaintiff still believes that a settlement conference would be beneficial after the parties have completed discovery, he may renew his request to set a settlement conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cain v. Paviglianti

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 13, 2022
2:20-cv-1768-DAD-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Cain v. Paviglianti

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO LAMONT CAIN, Plaintiff, v. B. PAVIGLIANTI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 13, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-1768-DAD-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)