From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cain v. Int'l Fruit Genetics

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 14, 2023
1:23-cv-01249-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-01249-JLT-CDB

11-14-2023

DAVID W. CAIN, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION OF KENNETH J. PFAEHLER TO PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE

(Doc. 16)

The Court has considered the application of Kenneth J. Pfaehler, attorney for Defendants International Fruit Genetics, LLC, Sunrise Nurseries, Inc., Glen Stoller, Craig Stoller, Rick Burns, Andy Higgins, and Van Kramer, for admission to practice pro hac vice under the provisions of Local Rule 180(b)(2).[ (Doc. 16).

Attorney Pfaehler represents that he appears on behalf of “International Fruit Genetics, LLC, et al.” (Doc. 16) (emphasis added). The Court notes that Defendants Jack J. Pandol and James A. Pandol (“Pandol Defendants”), have not yet appeared in this action. See (Doc. 17). Based on a separate pro hac vice application filed on the same date by an attorney from the same law firm as Attorney Pfaehler (Doc. 15), the Court assumes that Attorney Pfaehler does not represent the Pandol Defendants. If this is erroneous, Attorney Pfaehler SHALL FILE a corrected pro hac vice application.

In light of the application and for good cause appearing, Kenneth J. Pfaehler's application for admission to practice pro hac vice is HEREBY GRANTED.

The pro hac vice attorney is DIRECTED to request filing access through PACER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cain v. Int'l Fruit Genetics

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 14, 2023
1:23-cv-01249-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Cain v. Int'l Fruit Genetics

Case Details

Full title:DAVID W. CAIN, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL FRUIT GENETICS, LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 14, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-01249-JLT-CDB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023)