Opinion
CAUSE NO. 1:02CV111 LG.
December 13, 2007
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS UNOPPOSED
THE MATTER BEFORE THE COURT is the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [89] filed October 29, 2007. The Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendants' contention that this case must be dismissed because Plaintiff's claims have been fully discharged by the United States Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Texas, Austin Division.
The Court notes that the claims asserted in this lawsuit are specifically mentioned in the order of discharge, Ct. R. 91.
Rule 7.2(C)(2) of the UNIFORM LOCAL RULES FOR THE NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN DISTRICTS OF MISSISSIPPI allows the Court to grant a motion (other than one for summary judgment) as unopposed if any party fails to respond within the time allotted. The time allowed for a response to the Defendants' motion has passed. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [89] is GRANTED as unopposed pursuant to Rule 7.2(C)(2) of the UNIFORM LOCAL RULES FOR THE NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN DISTRICTS OF MISSISSIPPI. Plaintiff's claims against the Defendants are DISMISSED.