From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CAI INT. v. MARUBA S.C.A. EMPRESA DE NAVEGACION MARIT

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 26, 2010
09 Civ. 8631 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2010)

Opinion

09 Civ. 8631 (BSJ).

January 26, 2010


ORDER


On October 14, 2009, this Court issued an Order granting Plaintiff Cai International, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") request for process of maritime attachment and garnishment because it found that the conditions set forth in Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure appeared to exist. In this Order of Attachment, the Court advised Plaintiff that the attachment would automatically expire 45 days after the date of the Order unless Plaintiff confirmed by letter that it had commenced arbitration or other adversarial proceedings on the merits of the claims underlying the attachment. The Court also advised Plaintiff that the attachment would automatically expire 60 days from the date of its issuance if no assets or other property had yet been restrained pursuant to the Order.

To date, the Court has received no communication from Plaintiff with respect to the commencement of adversarial proceedings or the restraint of assets, and 104 days have passed since the Order of Attachment was issued. Accordingly, the Court's Order of Attachment of October 14, 2009 is VACATED and this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

CAI INT. v. MARUBA S.C.A. EMPRESA DE NAVEGACION MARIT

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 26, 2010
09 Civ. 8631 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2010)
Case details for

CAI INT. v. MARUBA S.C.A. EMPRESA DE NAVEGACION MARIT

Case Details

Full title:CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. MARUBA S.C.A. EMPRESA DE NAVEGACION…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 26, 2010

Citations

09 Civ. 8631 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2010)