Opinion
December 7, 2000.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered July 10, 2000, which, inter alia, denied defendant's motion to vacate a deficiency judgment entered against him on default, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Stephen Vlock, for plaintiff-respondent.
Michael H. Maizes, for defendant-appellant.
Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Williams, Andrias, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.
Defendant's claim that plaintiff is a foreign limited partnership doing business in New York without authority, and is therefore maintaining this action in violation of Partnership Law § 121-907(a), is unsupported by any evidence of systematic and regular activity (see, Alicanto, S.A. v. Woolverton, 129 A.D.2d 601, 602; cf., Partnership Law § 121-902[b]). Nor does defendant offer any persuasive evidence on valuation.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.