From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cadigan v. Strand Garage, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 4, 1966
221 N.E.2d 468 (Mass. 1966)

Opinion

November 4, 1966.

Maurice H. Kramer for the defendant.

William Coniaris for the plaintiff.


In this action of contract the plaintiff, a minor, seeks to recover from the seller the purchase price of an automobile. The judge found for the plaintiff. We see no point in quoting the defendant's requests for rulings or the judge's rulings on these requests. There was no error. The fact that the plaintiff's brother, who was over twenty-one years of age, was present and participated in the transaction does not remove the minor from the protection of the law if it is found that the minor was the sole purchaser of the vehicle. Frye v. Yasi, 327 Mass. 724. There was ample evidence to support such a finding.

Exceptions overruled.


Summaries of

Cadigan v. Strand Garage, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Nov 4, 1966
221 N.E.2d 468 (Mass. 1966)
Case details for

Cadigan v. Strand Garage, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EMMETT CADIGAN vs. STRAND GARAGE, INC

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Nov 4, 1966

Citations

221 N.E.2d 468 (Mass. 1966)
351 Mass. 703

Citing Cases

Scanlon v. Kansas City

. App. 527; Schmitz v. Ry. Co., 46 Mo. App. 391; Pennington v. Rys. Co., 213 S.W. 141; Baxter v. Transit Co.,…