From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cabbagestalk v. Dyson

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Mar 15, 2024
C. A. 3:23-cv-04582-SAL-SVH (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 2024)

Opinion

C. A. 3:23-cv-04582-SAL-SVH

03-15-2024

Ricardo Cabbagestalk, Plaintiff, v. William Dyson, Deputy Sheriff; Thomas A. West, Investigator; Anthony Dennis, Sheriff; and Allen Jackson Barnes, Public Defender, Defendants.


ORDER

Sherri A. Lydon United States District Judge

This matter is before the court for review of the November 9, 2023, Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.). [ECF No. 14.]. In the Report, the magistrate judge recommends the court dismiss this case without further leave for amendment. Attached to the Report was a notice advising Cabbagestalk of the procedures and requirements for filing objections to the Report and the serious consequences if he failed to do so. Id. at 7. Cabbagestalk has not filed objections, and the time for doing so has expired.

The magistrate judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of only those portions of the Report that have been specifically objected to, and the court may accept, reject, or modify the Report, in whole or in part. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of objections, the court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report and must “only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 advisory committee's note).

Having thoroughly reviewed the Report, the applicable law, and the record of this case in accordance with the above standard, the court finds no clear error, adopts the Report, ECF No. 14, and incorporates the Report by reference herein. The case is thus DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER LEAVE FOR AMENDMENT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cabbagestalk v. Dyson

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Mar 15, 2024
C. A. 3:23-cv-04582-SAL-SVH (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Cabbagestalk v. Dyson

Case Details

Full title:Ricardo Cabbagestalk, Plaintiff, v. William Dyson, Deputy Sheriff; Thomas…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina

Date published: Mar 15, 2024

Citations

C. A. 3:23-cv-04582-SAL-SVH (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 2024)