From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caban v. Bonaco Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 23, 1991
172 A.D.2d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 23, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.).


These two personal injury actions arise out of an explosion and fire which occurred on July 29, 1983, just north of the Union Square IRT subway station while several New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) employees one of whom died from injuries sustained, were engaged in the installation of guard and running rail plates. Plaintiff Davis, one of the injured workers and Rosemarie Caban, the administratrix of the deceased worker, commenced this action against the various contractors engaged by NYCTA to repair and install new tracks and perform certain electrical and signal work.

We have reviewed the record and agree that the IAS court properly granted the motions of defendants Slattery Associates, Inc., Jandous Electric Company and Berger Lehman Associates to dismiss plaintiffs' complaints as well as all cross claims and counterclaims asserted against them, as no material triable issues of fact existed concerning whether any of their employees caused the fatal explosion and fire. Furthermore, plaintiffs failed to come forward with evidence, except for unexplained workers in non-Transit Authority uniforms, that one or several of the defendants' employees were doing construction work on or near the site of the explosion.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Caban v. Bonaco Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 23, 1991
172 A.D.2d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Caban v. Bonaco Construction Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROSEMARIE CABAN, as Administratrix of the Estate of JOHN CABAN, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 23, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
568 N.Y.S.2d 758

Citing Cases

Weigl v. Quincy Specialties

However, the payment of compensation benefits does not shield employers from the entire law of torts (see, 2A…

Vaughn v. City of New York

Although the plaintiffs have received a copy of the laboratory report analyzing the subject mat, we note that…