From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caballero v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Jan 2, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00197-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 2, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00197-MP-EMT

01-02-2013

JOSE CABALLERO, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 30, 2012. (Doc. 13). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DENIED.

_________________

Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Caballero v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Jan 2, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00197-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Caballero v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE CABALLERO, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Jan 2, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00197-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 2, 2013)

Citing Cases

Agrawal v. Mayorkas

In this case, Petitioner will be deemed to be in the custody of I.C.E. because an Order of Removal has also…