From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CA, Inc. v. Netflix, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division
Oct 25, 2021
2:21-cv-00080-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00080-JRG-RSP

10-25-2021

CA, INC. and AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED, Plaintiffs, v. NETFLIX, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending denial of Defendant Netflix, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, Transfer to the Northern District of California (the “Report and Recommendation”) (Dkt. No. 110). Netflix, Inc. filed its Objections to the Report and Recommendation on October 5, 2021. (Dkt. No. 114.)

After considering de novo the reasoning provided in the Report and Recommendation, the underlying briefing on the Motion to Dismiss, and the Objections filed by Netflix, Inc., the Court agrees with the conclusions reached in the Report and Recommendation and finds the arguments made in the Objections to be unpersuasive. Accordingly, the Court overrules the Objections and adopts the Report and Recommendation.

The Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, Transfer to the Northern District of California (Dkt. No. 26) is DENIED.

So ORDERED.


Summaries of

CA, Inc. v. Netflix, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division
Oct 25, 2021
2:21-cv-00080-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2021)
Case details for

CA, Inc. v. Netflix, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CA, INC. and AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division

Date published: Oct 25, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00080-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2021)