From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C. O. Ry. Co. v. Bryant

U.S.
Feb 24, 1930
280 U.S. 404 (1930)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.

No. 113.

Argued January 16, 17, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930.

1. An action for wrongful death will not lie under the Federal Employers' Liability Act where the injury from which death resulted was inflicted two days after the employment of the decedent by the railway company had been terminated. P. 405. 2. The writ of certiorari should not issue to review a case in a state court as one governed by the Federal Employers' Liability Act, if judgment against the carrier was rested upon the state law, pursuant to a finding that the injured person's employment by the carrier had ceased before the injury occurred, and if there was some evidence to support that finding. Id. 152 Va. 263, affirmed.

CERTIORARI, 279 U.S. 834, to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, affirming a recovery against the Railway Company in an action for death by wrongful act.

Mr. J.M. Perry for petitioner.

Mr. Charles Curry, with whom Messrs. R.B. Stephenson and Curry Carter were on the brief, for respondent.


This is an action seeking to charge the petitioner for the death of the respondent's intestate, who was shot and killed by the foreman of a gang in which the deceased if not discharged would have worked. At the trial the petitioner demurred to the evidence, on the ground, among others, that at the time of the killing the parties were engaged in interstate commerce. The demurrer was overruled and the respondent (plaintiff) got judgment, which was affirmed by an equally divided Court. If the parties were governed by the Federal Employers' Liability Act the respondent might have difficulties from the decisions of this Court. Davis v. Green, 260 U.S. 349. Atlantic Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Southwell, 275 U.S. 64. But the deceased was killed on Monday, and there was some evidence that he had been discharged on the Saturday before. If so the Act of Congress did not govern and the parties were left to the State law, with which we have no concern. The writ of certiorari would not have been granted but for the impression that there was no doubt that the deceased was employed by the petitioner in interstate commerce up to the moment immediately preceding his death.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

C. O. Ry. Co. v. Bryant

U.S.
Feb 24, 1930
280 U.S. 404 (1930)
Case details for

C. O. Ry. Co. v. Bryant

Case Details

Full title:CHESAPEAKE OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v . BRYANT, ADMINISTRATOR

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 24, 1930

Citations

280 U.S. 404 (1930)

Citing Cases

Steeley v. Kurn

Whatever may be the law of Mississippi, a railroad company is not liable for such an act under the statutes…

Godsy v. Thompson

lure to ring the bell or to warn the plaintiff the proximate cause of the injury. Wagner v. St. L.-S.F. Ry.…