From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Time Warner Cable

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 10, 2010
Case Number: 1:09cv772 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 10, 2010)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:09cv772.

September 10, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge J. Gregory Wehrman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on June 9, 2010 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 36). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 43).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, the Court finds that defendants are entitled to summary judgment with respect to plaintiff's claims for wrongful termination in violation of Ohio public policy (Count II), age discrimination in violation of the Ohio law (Count IV) and disability discrimination in violation of the ADA (Count VIII).

Therefore, defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 7) is GRANTED and Counts II, IV and VIII of plaintiff's complaint are DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Byrd v. Time Warner Cable

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 10, 2010
Case Number: 1:09cv772 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Byrd v. Time Warner Cable

Case Details

Full title:Carol Byrd, Plaintiff(s), v. Time Warner Cable, et. al., Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Sep 10, 2010

Citations

Case Number: 1:09cv772 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 10, 2010)