From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 24, 2017
NO. 03-16-00133-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 03-16-00133-CR

08-24-2017

Keevin Dashawn Byrd, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 74451 , HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found appellant Keevin Dashawn Byrd guilty of the felony offense of manslaughter and assessed punishment at confinement for eight years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 19.04 (manslaughter), 12.33 (second-degree felony punishment).

Appellant's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81-82 (1988).

Appellant's counsel has certified to this Court that she sent copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. Appellant has filed a pro se brief.

We have conducted an independent review of the record—including the record of the proceedings below, appellate counsel's brief, and appellant's brief—and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

/s/_________

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Bourland Affirmed Filed: August 24, 2017 Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Byrd v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 24, 2017
NO. 03-16-00133-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2017)
Case details for

Byrd v. State

Case Details

Full title:Keevin Dashawn Byrd, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Aug 24, 2017

Citations

NO. 03-16-00133-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2017)