From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jan 30, 2001
36 S.W.3d 443 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 76686

January 30, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE THOMAS C. GRADY

S. Paige Canfield, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

John Munson Morris, III Assistant Attorney General, Linda Lemke, P.O. Box 899 Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Mary K. Hoff, C.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Robert E. Crist, Sr. J.



Ronnie Byrd, movant, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Byrd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jan 30, 2001
36 S.W.3d 443 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Byrd v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE BYRD, Defendant/Movant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Jan 30, 2001

Citations

36 S.W.3d 443 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)