From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 12, 2021
316 So. 3d 438 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D20-1963

05-12-2021

Samuel K. BYRD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Samuel K. Byrd, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Samuel K. Byrd, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Osterhaus, Bilbrey, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Byrd v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
May 12, 2021
316 So. 3d 438 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Byrd v. State

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL K. BYRD, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 12, 2021

Citations

316 So. 3d 438 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)