From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 1, 1985
467 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. AW-176.

May 1, 1985.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Bay County; N. Russell Bower, Judge.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender and Steven L. Bolotin, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


After carefully reviewing the entire record, we find no reversible error. The orders of probation entered by the trial court, however, incorrectly state the offenses of selling cocaine and selling cannabis, while the jury found Byrd guilty of the lesser included offense of possession of cocaine and Byrd pled nolo contendere to possession of less than twenty grams of cannabis. The orders of probation must be corrected to reflect the proper offenses. Accordingly, this cause is remanded for correction of these errors.

JOANOS, THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Byrd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 1, 1985
467 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Byrd v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRADY OTIS BYRD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 1, 1985

Citations

467 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)