From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Son

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 23, 2023
2:22-cv-02000-CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02000-CKD P

05-23-2023

JAMES BYRD, Plaintiff, v. MONIVIRIN SON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By an order filed November 9, 2022, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed the required documents.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Byrd v. Son

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 23, 2023
2:22-cv-02000-CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Byrd v. Son

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BYRD, Plaintiff, v. MONIVIRIN SON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 23, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02000-CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2023)