From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Norman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 25, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-563-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Apr. 25, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-563-JWD-EWD

04-25-2017

KEDRICK BYRD v. GARY F. NORMAN, ET AL.


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated April 10, 2017, to which no objection was filed:

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, (Doc. 8), is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that Plaintiff's request for fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) is also DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for a scheduling conference.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within seven (7) days of the date of this order, P&S, LLC and P&S, Inc. shall jointly file a Motion to Substitute P&S, LLC as a party defendant, specifically stating whether Plaintiff objects to the proposed substitution.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on April 25, 2017.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Byrd v. Norman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 25, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-563-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Apr. 25, 2017)
Case details for

Byrd v. Norman

Case Details

Full title:KEDRICK BYRD v. GARY F. NORMAN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Apr 25, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-563-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Apr. 25, 2017)

Citing Cases

Fagan v. Thomas

Other courts have chosen to apply these holdings only when the removal action attempts to manufacture subject…

Calcasieu Cameron Hosp. Serv. Dist. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co

Id. As authority for its argument that it is the real party in interest, AGLIC offers Lefort v. Entergy…